Workshop on Internet Governance at the national level
|
|
|
Morning
Session Panelists |
Biography
|
Presentation
|
* Mr. Giovanni Seppia, General Manager,
Council of European National Top Level Domain Registries (CENTR)
|

|

|
* Ms. Emily Taylor, Director of Legal and Policy,
Nominet UK and Mr Martin
Boyle, Assistant Director,
International Information Economy Policy, Department of Tade
and Industry, UK
|
 |
 |
* Mr. François
Maurer, Head of Section, Telecom, Naming and Adressing
Division, Federal
Office of Communications
|

|

|
* Mr. Marcel
Schneider, Manager Special
Operations and International Relations, Swiss Education and
Research Network (SWITCH), Switzerland
|
|
 |
* Dr. Ibraheem
Al-Furaih, Assistant Director for
Technical Affairs, Internet Services Unit of Saudi Arabia
|

|

|
* Mr. Michael Katundu, Assistant Director,
Information Technology, Communications
Commission of Kenya
|

|

|
* Ms. Theresa
Swinehart, General Manager for Global Partnerships, ICANN
|
 |
 |
* Mr Chris
Disspain, Chairman of the ccNSO (The Country Code Name
Supporting Organization) and Chief Executive Officer of auDA, .au Domain Registration
Ltd.
|
 |
 |
Afternoon
Session Panelists |
Biography
|
Presentation
|
* Ms. Valerie
D'Costa, Director of International
Affairs, InfoComm Development Authority of Singapore
|
 |
 |
* Ms. Thu Hue
Nguyen, Global Internet Policy Initiative (GIPI) Country Coordinator,
Vietnam
|
 |
 |
* Mr. Rishi Chawla,
President, ISOC New Delhi and Global Internet Policy Initiative
(GIPI) Country Coordinator, India
|
 |
 |
* Mr. Marcelo Lopes, Secretary of IT Policy,
Ministry of Science and Technology, Brazil
|
|
 |
* Mr. Baher
Esmat, Telecom Planning Manager,
Ministry of ICT, Egypt
|

|

|
* Mr. Keith
Davidson, Executive Director,
InternetNZ
|
 |
 |
|
Background
The
WGIG Report notes that “international coordination needs to
build on policy coordination at the national level” and that
“global Internet governance can only be effective if there
is coherence with regional, subregional and national-level
policies”. The WGIG recommends “that coordination be
established among all stakeholders at the national level and a
multi-stakeholder national Internet governance steering
committee or similar body be set up” (paragraph 73 of the
WGIG Report.)
This
provided the rationale for the one-day workshop, which focused on national policies related to Internet governance and
highlighted the importance of a coordinated multi-stakeholder
approach at the national level.
Purpose
and content
The
Meeting brought together people with a broad range of
backgrounds in national Internet governance from different
parts of the globe, representing different stakeholder groups.
The
workshop presented various case studies, looking at
different models and representing a wide range of experiences.
The
aim of this workshop was to learn from each other’s
experiences, share best practices and solutions and identify
problems and pitfalls.
The
morning session was a panel discussion focusing on country
code top level domain names (ccTLDs) and their relationships
to national authorities, illustrating different models of
cooperation between Governments and their local Internet
community. It started with a presentation from the Council
of European National TLD Registries (CENTR), who gave an
overview of the ccTLD name space. It was followed by
presentations of national ccTLD management by representatives
from the UK, Switzerland, Kenya and Saudi Arabia, also
examining questions related to Internationalized Domain Names
(IDN). Representatives from ICANN and the Country Code Name
Supporting Organization (ccNSO) explained the relationship
between ccTLDs and ICANN.
The presentations was followed by a question and
answer session and open discussion.
The
afternoon session focused on broader aspects of national
Internet governance. Panellists from Brazil, Egypt, India, New
Zealand, Singapore and Vietnam gave presentations of
national policies and multi-stakeholder cooperation in their
respective countries. The panel examined among other things the legal and policy frameworks as well as principles
commonly viewed as conducive to the development and growth of
the Internet.
|